Analyses
An Update on Global Listed Infrastructure
|
Insight Article
|
• |
novembre 16, 2023
|
novembre 16, 2023
|
An Update on Global Listed Infrastructure |
1 | The MSIM Global Listed Infrastructure Team sees a strong fundamental outlook for Global Listed Infrastructure (GLI) moving forward: We view the relative recent underperformance of GLI securities to be predominantly driven by non-fundamental factors. |
|
2 | GLI companies appear to be better positioned to retain margins: For many infrastructure companies, interest and other operating costs are typically considered “pass-through.” |
|
3 | Current valuations are at odds with the fundamental backdrop and relative to broader equity performance: Relative to global equities, GLI, as represented by the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure (DJBGI) Index, now trades (as of October 2023) below post-pandemic trough levels, despite a materially different fundamental picture. |
|
4 | GLI could benefit from a recessionary environment: GLI has a history of outperforming global equities in challenging economic periods. |
|
5 | The long term outlook remains strong: Low volatility of earnings, stable cash flows and attractive returns remain the key elements of the GLI asset class. |
GLI has had a challenging 2023 (through October), underperforming the broader global equity markets and giving up essentially all of the material relative outperformance witnessed in 2022 (Display 1). Indeed, some of the core sectors of infrastructure have been the worst equity market performers through YTD through October, alongside other “defensive” sectors, such as Consumer Staples and Healthcare (Display 2).
Given this level of relative underperformance, two questions naturally follow: 1) Is the cause of relative underperformance a result of fundamental, operational and/or financial challenges at the industry/company level - or are there other factors at play? And, 2) Where does MSIM currently stand from a valuation perspective, both in absolute terms and relative to global equities.
This paper looks to answer these two key questions, as well as to review the potential performance of GLI over the next 12-24 months in the context of either a global recession or a “soft/no” landing scenario, and subsequent economic re-acceleration.
Causes of Underperformance – Are There Fundamental Issues?
In short, we view the relative underperformance of GLI securities in 2023 to be predominantly driven by non-fundamental factors, given the favorable top- and bottom-line trends for most asset/industry types in infrastructure this year. Looking at the four broad industry categories of core listed infrastructure securities strategies - Utilities, Energy Infrastructure, Communications and Transportation - only Communications exhibits a challenging 12-24 months fundamental backdrop, largely concentrated within the U.S. wireless tower subsector, where 2023 cash flow growth is largely nonexistent (Display 3). By contrast, European tower operators and global data center companies are currently enjoying robust fundamental trends. In other sectors we see solid, mid- to high-single digit revenue and cash flow/earnings growth, with some subsectors exhibiting even stronger fundamental trends. In the context of a decelerating global economy (in most regions), we certainly view these stable operating trends as quite favorable.
What About the Influence of Interest Rates and Inflation on Valuation and Operating Margins?
As a starting point, it should be noted that despite all the angst related to interest rates and global central bank policy, long-term interest rates, while higher, have not grown as fast as short-term interest rates (e.g., the U.S. 10-year Treasury was 3.87% on 12/31/2022 compared to 4.88% on 10/31/2023). Short-term interest rates are another matter entirely. That said, it is natural to assume that interest rate pressure may provide some short-term headwinds to equity valuations, in particular for those companies that (1) have greater debt leverage in their capital structure and (2) are thought of as an alternative to other non-equity “income” investments. Within the GLI universe, this predominantly relates to the Utilities and Communications sectors, where companies are prized for their steady, stable dividend streams. As seen in Display 4 and 5, both sectors are trading at attractive valuations relative to the broader equity markets.
Furthermore, it is important to keep in mind that higher interest costs are often offset through regulation and/or company contract structure over the short- to medium-term. These costs are typically “pass through,” with no impact on margins for Utilities, and can be offset by rent escalators/inflationary top-line growth for tower companies in Communications. More broadly as it relates to inflation, infrastructure companies are better positioned to retain margins compared to most general market equities, given that not only interest costs, but also other operating cost items, can be considered “pass-through” within a regulatory construct.
In fairness, there are some headwinds to these defensive sectors in the short-run (e.g., wireless carrier churn for towers and customer bill pressure in conjunction with rate cases for utilities). However, we do not believe this justifies the magnitude of relative underperformance, particularly in the context of where these assets trade in the private markets (i.e., in an absolute sense).
Perhaps the more pertinent question is one of generalist equity portfolios more broadly in the context of “risk-free” investments and other fixed income alternatives. While the MSIM Global Listed Infrastructure Team is not a generalist equity investor, simple comparisons of the equity market’s earnings yield vs. alternatives highlight that equities may be at more expensive levels, implying that while GLI has been penalized for its lack of income relative to fixed income and money-market alternatives, other parts of the equity markets have not (see Displays 7-9).
Where Does the Current Relative Underperformance Leave Us From a Valuation Perspective?
In our view, current share price levels for GLI paint a materially positive view, relative to both the global equity markets and precedent private-market infrastructure transactions, given the lackluster YTD performance. As can be seen in Display 10, GLI now trades at levels below the post-pandemic trough vs. global equities, despite a materially different fundamental picture. As a reminder, during the COVID/pandemic period, the transportation and energy infrastructure sectors were negatively impacted directly by lockdowns and lower demand, in contrast to the current setup today. Also note that the period of relative underperformance for GLI was followed by a period of strong relative outperformance, as witnessed in 2022.
Switching to listed vs. private market valuations, the discussion is more challenging given the differences in single asset transaction underwriting within the private markets. However, using recent private market transactions across sectors, we would note a broadly favorable comparison in favor of GLI, with the communications sector comparison particularly notable (Display 11).
Finally, in terms of absolute valuation vs. trading history, the picture for GLI is favorable, where transportation and communications stand out (Display 12).
What Happens to Global Listed Infrastructure in a Recessionary Environment? What Happens in a Soft/No Landing Scenario? And Do We See a Re-Acceleration of the Global Economy in 2024?
While listed infrastructure has not performed well year-to-date despite lingering doubts about the near-term trajectory of the global economy, the longer-term track record for infrastructure in equity drawdown periods and recessionary environments on a relative basis is strong. We assume this time should be no different and would note the underperformance in 2020 shown in Display 13 can be explained by the pandemic, not a general economic downturn (the specifics of COVID directly impacted certain infrastructure subsectors in contrast to most economic downturns). In most instances, GLI is a material outperformer to global equities in challenging economic and market periods.
Alternatively, should we succeed in avoiding a modest economic downturn (or one entirely) in 2023 and return to global growth in 2024, we believe global listed infrastructure could perform well for the following reasons:
The Longer-Term Case for Global Listed Infrastructure
As a reminder, the longer-term case for GLI appears to be strong. Since inception of the DJBGI Index, GLI has provided superior returns to global equities at lower volatility, as the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Index overperformed the MSCI World Net Index by 2% over the past 20 years. Furthermore, in an absolute sense, we view the 9.01% annualized return as solid in the context of an asset class with lower dispersion of earnings variability (Display 14).
Summary of the MSIM Global Listed Infrastructure Team Investment Proposition:
Global Listed Infrastructure Team
|