Insight Article Desktop Banner
Insight Article
August 01, 2022

CAPEX Reshapes Credit Profile: Sectors in Flux - U.S. Technology Emerging as Clear Winner

Insight Video Mobile Banner
August 01, 2022

CAPEX Reshapes Credit Profile: Sectors in Flux - U.S. Technology Emerging as Clear Winner

Insight Article

CAPEX Reshapes Credit Profile: Sectors in Flux - U.S. Technology Emerging as Clear Winner

Share Icon

August 01, 2022


Despite macro uncertainties, global capital spending continues to surge after a period of short-lived contraction in 2020, powering the post-pandemic economic recovery.

We expect U.S. Investment Grade Corporate CAPEX to increase +15% in 2022, maintaining the +14% year-over-year (YoY) momentum in 2021 (Display 1). Its impact on fundamental credit profile flows through all three financial statements: CAPEX is a key determinant of cash flow, of multi-year leverage trajectory and debt supply, as well as of future revenue and margins through capturing demand and increasing productivity over time.

We view U.S. Technology as a clear winner, while U.S. Utilities and U.S. Telecom emerge as sectors most under pressure (Display 2).

Global CAPEX Is on the Rise

Source: S&P Global CAPEX Survey 2021. Forecasts/estimates are based on current market conditions, subject to change, and may not necessarily come to pass.

CAPEX Is Impacting Different Sectors in Different Ways

For informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security or to adopt any specific investment strategy.


According to the U.S. Census Bureau 2022 Capital Spending Report (Display 3), from 2011 to 2020 U.S. non-farm businesses increased total spending from $1,243.0 billion to $1,706.4 billion, an increase of $463.5 billion (+37.3%). The increase was led by Utilities (+85.8% or $84.2bn), partially offset by the largest decrease in the Mining sector (-41.4% or $68.6bn). Underlying this trend are three driving factors: Sustainability, Supply chain, and Security.

The Three Reasons CAPEX Is Rising: Sustainability, Supply Chain, Security

The broader transition to a more sustainable global economy drives higher CAPEX across industries in order to reduce carbon emissions, protect water supply and improve the environmental and social impact of supply chains over the long term. Key themes include electric vehicles (EV), utility grid upgrades, transition from fossil fuels to renewables, and overall energy efficiency.

U.S. Census 2022 Capital Spending Report

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2022 Capital Spending Report


Government policies broadly incentivize and support corporate Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) initiatives. The ongoing Assessment Reports of the Paris Agreement and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) helped to consolidate international support and increase corporate commitments to net zero carbon emissions, with Europe leading the way. Specifically, Europe’s “Fit for 55” package and other efforts have provided tailwinds for green CAPEX by providing command and control mechanisms such as fuel blending mandates, offering clarity in defining sustainable activities (EU Taxonomy), and adopting market-based approaches to implement carbon initiatives, which include carbon markets and border adjustment mechanisms for carbon intensive sectors such as steel, cement, aluminum, and fertilizers.

Estimates on economy-wide investment requirements have an understandable spread, although they clearly exceed current capital expenditures. By 2030, annual global investment requirements to meet net zero goals are anticipated to $4 - $5.7 trillion per year in clean energy and energy infrastructure alone,1 at least three times current levels. Recent research from McKinsey suggests that using the hypothetical Net Zero 2050 scenario from the Network for Greening the Financial System, annual overall green investments needed to stay on track for net zero between now and 2050 are $9.2 trillion ($275 trillion total).

While we may reflexively think of government compelled “green” capital investment as detrimental to corporate balance sheets, the European Union has put in place several mechanisms to protect European corporations from competition by taxing less-sustainable imports. The time bound, science-based goals create immediate investment pressure on both public and private sectors, particularly as the importance of achieving 2030 interim targets becomes increasingly clear. Therefore, we view Europe as a potential bellwether for the U.S. and expect to see even higher green CAPEX levels globally.

Global supply chain is another hot topic—strained in normal times and stressed repeatedly in recent years for a variety of reasons—and U.S. corporates are diversifying manufacturing capabilities in response. They are also increasing efficiency and automation, bolstering productivity to address labor shortages and tight inventories.

Labor inflation is a key leading indicator for manufacturing CAPEX. Under current conditions, we expect to see a cycle of elevated spending to improve profitability. Companies look to automate wherever possible in order to compensate for low labor levels and high wages, however these investments are initiated in sectors where demand outstrips supply and strong cash flows can fund the spending.

In the theme of de-globalization, many industries are onshoring manufacturing capabilities to address shipping bottlenecks in the near-term and increase diversification longer-term. Companies in the Machinery, Electrical and Transportation equipment sectors are seeking to re-shore to reduce lead time and increase flexibility, whilst companies in the Aerospace, Communication, Automotive, Semiconductors, Chemicals, Medical products, Pharma sectors list national security and supply security as the top reason. This trend is broadly aligned with the U.S.’s sustainability goals and the broader economic agenda to boost domestic GDP and create jobs post pandemic.

Geopolitical security has taken on heightened importance in 2022 given the ongoing Russian/Ukraine conflict in Europe. Where it intersects with Sustainability and Supply Chain, we see CAPEX dedicated to address all these concerns take priority. Namely in Agriculture and Energy sectors, along with the push for decarbonization, we see initiatives aimed at bolstering the aggregate level of supply and diversifying away from certain regions. For example, there are discussions for the U.S. and EU to boost supplies of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in European countries by the end of 2022, which would help reduce reliance on Russian gas and incentivize greater LNG diversification. The REPowerEU plan would not only cut Russian gas imports, but also call for an accelerated integration of wind and solar, biomethane production, and heat pump addition. The goal of these plans, in collaboration with international partners, is to chart an alternative path for Europe’s energy security since Russian gas currently accounts for about 40% of total supply.

SECTORS WITH STRONG TAILWINDS: Limited rating migration net of new supply. Benefits from strong government support and increased financial flexibility. We believe current CAPEX investments will directly accrue to higher productivity, better margins and drive future demand with limited impact on credit profile.

  • The U.S. IG Technology sector is experiencing exceptionally strong underlying demand, as the pandemic both accelerated digital transformation and boosted consumer savings in the U.S.

    U.S. IG Technology issuers expect higher free cash flow across the board while ramping up investments to meet backlog and manage supply chain disruptions. For the IG Tech sector in particular, CAPEX spend can directly boost productivity, increases margins, and enables firms to gain greater scale. This tailwind has lifted a crop of rising stars from the BB rating category to BBB in 2021, and we expect the trend to continue.

    In particular, supply chain disruptions amidst this exceptionally strong demand backdrop have driven semiconductor companies to increase capital spending by $200bn+ over the next decade in the U.S. and Europe in order to secure supply. While we do expect continued debt supply from the high-rated names in the space to partly fund higher CAPEX, the impact on credit profiles and current ratings should be de minimis. Companies in the space have accumulated large cash balances, significant financial flexibility through asset sale, spin, or IPO transactions, and could expect incremental government support in boosting domestic semiconductor manufacturing capabilities. Overall, we expect improved credit profiles and more rising stars as strong demand creates opportunity for increased scale.

Deterioration in credit profile net of new supply. Incremental CAPEX is a “tax” on free cashflow (FCF) and leverage profile driven by regulation and/or market dynamics. Higher leverage occurs without commensurate growth in future demand and profitability.

  • U.S. Utilities – Over the past decade, U.S. electric utilities have intensified their capital spending, i) to reduce carbon pollution, ii) to update and replace aging infrastructure, iii) to harden systems and protect against more volatile weather and, iv) to pay for smart grid technology, increased security to safeguard against physical and cyber-attacks. Regulated Utilities’ prudent capital investments can have a positive impact on their Return on Equity (ROE), as it increases their underlying rate-base. In the near-term credit metrics can be negatively impacted as CAPEX is largely debt financed and with some lag expected before cash flow begins.

  • U.S. Telecoms – Despite heavy spending on 5G wireless spectrum and CAPEX, these investments do not necessarily lead to greater pricing power or revenues. Rather, carriers are forced to make these investments in order to not fall behind in network performance and guard their respective wireless market shares. New 5G use cases are preliminarily being contemplated (i.e. – augmented reality, metaverse, internet-of-things, fixed-wireless broadband), but monetization and business models remain far from clear. While a key company predicts that the addressable market size of “network-as-a-service” will expand from $340 to $460 billion from 2021-26, CAPEX spending in Telecom is currently peaking and is expected to drop measurably in 2023, as major spectrum auctions generally occur every five years.

Rife with challenges and opportunities, with final outcomes driven by public policy, level of government support, and management teams’ choices in navigating the path forward.

We believe three sectors are particularly sensitive to the future course of public policy in their respective areas.

  • Automobiles – Global Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) CAPEX, which represents ~50% of total Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) R&D/CAPEX, is estimated to increase to $120 billion between 2020 and 2025. A large portion is currently funded by higher margin SUVs/ pickup trucks on strong demand, and OEMs’ continued emphasis on these vehicles over smaller/compact models. This in turn allows for the protection of operating margins that are higher than pre-pandemic levels, a positive for ratings profiles considering continued supply chain challenges and in particular, chip shortages.

    Over the past decade in the U.S., a variety of policies on the federal and local level have supported EV demand and helped companies scale manufacturing and battery capabilities. This was done through purchase subsidies and/or vehicle purchase and registration tax rebates, which aimed to help reduce the price gap with conventional vehicles. However, the U.S. still trails Europe & China in EV sales due to less stringent government mandates, differences in infrastructure investment, and consume preference.

    As much as 38% of greenhouse gas emissions are caused by passenger cars.2 In order to meet stringent regulatory requirements as well as stay competitive, European automakers have increased spending on future technologies (e.g. electric car batteries and powertrain, digitalization). For example, one of the leading players is planning to spend at least 55% of its R&D and CAPEX budget on these technologies, ultimately reducing tailpipe emissions of its fleet as well as reducing carbon-intensity of its production plants.

  • Energy – After decades of structural underinvestment in traditional energy sources, the sector now must contend with optimizing CAPEX in an inflationary environment with increasing energy transition mandates. Globally, oil-based fuel consumption now stands 3% above pre-Covid levels.3 Europe’s pivot away from Russian natural gas supply is also supportive of U.S. LNG development.

    In this context, we are seeing 15-20% capital spending increases but only 0-5% production increases. The outliers are the supermajor integrated names which are raising their CAPEX budgets to around 30% growth as they pick-up spending on clean energy projects.

  • EU Utilities – European utilities continue to spend heavily on the retirement of coal plants and the construction of more renewable wind and solar generation. Coal and nuclear shutdowns have occurred rapidly, offset by a sharp rise in power prices, driving the need for replacement power, stability, and security of fuel imports. The Russia/Ukraine conflict is accelerating sustainability programs in Europe, with added urgency to a longer-term pivot away from Russian natural gas supply and bolstering future energy security.

    Thus far higher natural gas prices have been absorbed with subsidies from governments, passed on to consumers with tariff increases. In addition, the REPowerEU plan now calls for a two-thirds reduction in gas imports from Russia by winter 2022/23 through alternative supply sources, energy efficiency/savings, electrification, and filling storage to 90% by Oct. 1, 2022 (MS Equity Research).

    Nuclear generation has been controversial: it is a core component for France but opposed by Germany. However, in order to accelerate transition, new construction for both nuclear and natural gas (on a temporary phase out basis) have been included in the EU taxonomy for new project spending.

    Another area of focus is the expansion of network grids. This includes greater regional interconnectedness, support for EV charging, and smart grids to improve efficiency for consumers.

  • Pharma/Healthcare/Life Science & Diagnostics – The Covid pandemic was a key catalyst for increased manufacturing and R&D spending, where we see 50-100% increases among Life Sciences & Diagnostic companies compared to pre-Covid levels. Higher CAPEX alone has limited the impact on sector credit profiles, with rating trajectory and balance sheet capacity largely determined by M&A, and the outcome of U.S. drug pricing legislation.

and could benefit from targeted, long-term solutions that address higher input costs in an inflationary environment.

  • U.S. Transportation: Airlines have heavy CAPEX commitments over the next few years as they focus on fleet renewal and right-size capacity, taking delivery of newer, more fuel-efficient aircrafts which would both lessen the impact of higher commodity prices and drive environmental goals longer-term. Travel demand and input costs are significant drivers for the sector. Trucking is moving towards automation to offset a tight labor environment, which requires large upfront costs. Rails are mostly focused on keeping CAPEX at 15% of revenue or below given continued focus to remove costs and improve profitability, though recent productivity initiatives mainly seek to offset inflationary pressures.

  • Environmental Services: Another CAPEX intensive sector with an average spend at 12% of revenue expected for 2022, in-line with historical averages. At least one notable company is directing incremental investments in renewable natural gas capacity, as part of its broader push for sustainability initiatives and improved investor perception of the sector.

  • Paper & Packaging: CAPEX guidance increased across the board for a core group of IG issuers in 2022, aimed to drive organic capacity growth in a tight supply environment, and automation of existing assets to manage labor supply shortages.
CAPEX Summary: Credit Profile Winners and Losers

Source: Morgan Stanley Investment Management IG Research. Forecasts/estimates are based on current market conditions, subject to change, and may not necessarily come to pass.


The fundamental impacts of CAPEX tell one piece of the story

When we think about investment allocations by sector, the effect of CAPEX on credit profiles is only one piece of the puzzle, one that must be tied to our fundamental views on valuation. The debate about where spreads are going and what is already priced in at current levels remains the key focus for credit investors. Given elevated CAPEX over a multi-year time frame, we could expect to see increasing debt supply which may push spreads wider.

We offer here a visualization of potential fundamental and technical drivers of spread changes resulting from CAPEX outlook. This is based on survey responses of MSIM Fixed Income research analysts on supply outlook and credit profile trajectory of issuers in our benchmark indices. Display 4 above illustrates the relationship between directional changes in credit profiles against expected CAPEX growth and size each sector on relative scale of future CAPEX.


Risk Considerations

Diversification neither assures a profit nor guarantees against loss in a declining market.

There is no assurance that a portfolio will achieve its investment objective. Portfolios are subject to market risk, which is the possibility that the market values of securities owned by the portfolio will decline and that the value of portfolio shares may therefore be less than what you paid for them. Market values can change daily due to economic and other events (e.g. natural disasters, health crises, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest) that affect markets, countries, companies or governments. It is difficult to predict the timing, duration, and potential adverse effects (e.g. portfolio liquidity) of events. Accordingly, you can lose money investing in a portfolio. Fixed-income securities are subject to the ability of an issuer to make timely principal and interest payments (credit risk), changes in interest rates (interest rate risk), the creditworthiness of the issuer and general market liquidity (market risk). In a rising interest-rate environment, bond prices may fall and may result in periods of volatility and increased portfolio redemptions. In a declining interest-rate environment, the portfolio may generate less income. Longer-term securities may be more sensitive to interest rate changes. Certain U.S. government securities purchased by the strategy, such as those issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. It is possible that these issuers will not have the funds to meet their payment obligations in the future. Public bank loans are subject to liquidity risk and the credit risks of lower-rated securities. High-yield securities (junk bonds) are lower-rated securities that may have a higher degree of credit and liquidity risk. Sovereign debt securities are subject to default risk. Mortgage- and asset-backed securities are sensitive to early prepayment risk and a higher risk of default, and may be hard to value and difficult to sell (liquidity risk). They are also subject to credit, market and interest rate risks. The currency market is highly volatile. Prices in these markets are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand for a particular currency; trade; fiscal, money and domestic or foreign exchange control programs and policies; and changes in domestic and foreign interest rates. Investments in foreign markets entail special risks such as currency, political, economic and market risks. The risks of investing in emerging market countries are greater than the risks generally associated with foreign investments. Derivative instruments may disproportionately increase losses and have a significant impact on performance. They also may be subject to counterparty, liquidity, valuation, and correlation and market risks. Restricted and illiquid securities may be more difficult to sell and value than publicly traded securities (liquidity risk). Due to the possibility that prepayments will alter the cash flows on collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), it is not possible to determine in advance their final maturity date or average life. In addition, if the collateral securing the CMOs or any third-party guarantees are insufficient to make payments, the portfolio could sustain a loss.
Executive Director, Research
Associate, Research
Chief Strategist, Fixed Income
Head of Investment Grade Credit
Head of U.S. Investment Grade Credit
Head of U.S. Non-Financial Research
Head of European Non-Financial Research
Analyst, Research
Vice President, Research
Vice President, Research
Executive Director, Research
Vice President, Research
Analyst, Research
Executive Director, Research
Senior Associate, Calvert
Associate, Calvert
Associate, Calvert


Basis point: One basis point = 0.01%.

There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will work under all market conditions, and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long-term, especially during periods of downturn in the market.

A separately managed account may not be appropriate for all investors. Separate accounts managed according to the particular strategy may include securities that may not necessarily track the performance of a particular index. Please consider the investment objectives, risks and fees of the Strategy carefully before investing A minimum asset level is required. For important information about the investment managers, please refer to Form ADV Part 2.

The views and opinions and/or analysis expressed are those of the author or the investment team as of the date of preparation of this material and are subject to change at any time without notice due to market or economic conditions and may not necessarily come to pass. Furthermore, the views will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available or circumstances existing, or changes occurring, after the date of publication. The views expressed do not reflect the opinions of all investment personnel at Morgan Stanley Investment Management (MSIM) and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively “the Firm”) and may not be reflected in all the strategies and products that the Firm offers.

Forecasts and/or estimates provided herein are subject to change and may not actually come to pass. Information regarding expected market returns and market outlooks is based on the research, analysis and opinions of the authors or the investment team. These conclusions are speculative in nature, may not come to pass and are not intended to predict the future performance of any specific strategy or product the Firm offers. Future results may differ significantly depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions.

This material has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information, internally developed data and other third-party sources believed to be reliable. However, no assurances are provided regarding the reliability of such information and the Firm has not sought to independently verify information taken from public and third-party sources.

This material is a general communication, which is not impartial and all information provided has been prepared solely for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security or to adopt any specific investment strategy. The information herein has not been based on a consideration of any individual investor circumstances and is not investment advice, nor should it be construed in any way as tax, accounting, legal or regulatory advice. To that end, investors should seek independent legal and financial advice, including advice as to tax consequences, before making any investment decision.

Charts and graphs provided herein are for illustrative purposes only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The indexes are unmanaged and do not include any expenses, fees or sales charges. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Any index referred to herein is the intellectual property (including registered trademarks) of the applicable licensor. Any product based on an index is in no way sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by the applicable licensor and it shall not have any liability with respect thereto.

This material is not a product of Morgan Stanley’s Research Department and should not be regarded as a research material or a recommendation.

The Firm has not authorised financial intermediaries to use and to distribute this material, unless such use and distribution is made in accordance with applicable law and regulation. Additionally, financial intermediaries are required to satisfy themselves that the information in this material is appropriate for any person to whom they provide this material in view of that person’s circumstances and purpose. The Firm shall not be liable for, and accepts no liability for, the use or misuse of this material by any suchfinancial intermediary.

This material may be translated into other languages. Where such a translationis made this English version remains definitive. If there are any discrepanciesbetween the English version and any version of this material in anotherlanguage, the English version shall prevail.

The whole or any part of this material may not be directly or indirectlyreproduced, copied, modified, used to create a derivative work, performed,displayed, published, posted, licensed, framed, distributed or transmittedor any of its contents disclosed to third parties without the Firm’s expresswritten consent. This material may not be linked to unless such hyperlinkis for personal and non-commercial use. All information contained herein is proprietary and is protected under copyright and other applicable law.

Eaton Vance is part of Morgan Stanley Investment Management. Morgan Stanley Investment Management is the asset management division of Morgan Stanley.


This material is only intended for and will only be distributed to persons resident in jurisdictions where such distribution or availability would not be contrary to local laws or regulations.

MSIM, the asset management division of Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), and its affiliates have arrangements in place to market each other’s products and services. Each MSIM affiliate is regulated as appropriate in the jurisdiction it operates. MSIM’s affiliates are: Eaton Vance Management (International) Limited, Eaton Vance Advisers International Ltd, Calvert Research and Management, Eaton Vance Management, Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and Atlanta Capital Management LLC.

This material has been issued by any one or more of the following entities:


This material is for Professional Clients/Accredited Investors only.

In the EU, MSIM and Eaton Vance materials are issued by MSIM Fund Management (Ireland) Limited (“FMIL”). FMIL is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and is incorporated in Ireland as a private company limited by shares with company registration number 616661 and has its registered address at The Observatory, 7-11 Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Dublin 2, D02 VC42, Ireland.

Outside the EU, MSIM materials are issued by Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited (MSIM Ltd) is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England. Registered No. 1981121. Registered Office: 25 Cabot Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 4QA.

In Switzerland, MSIM materials are issued by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, London (Zurich Branch) Authorised and regulated by the Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht (“FINMA”). Registered Office: Beethovenstrasse 33, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland.

Outside the U.S. and EU, Eaton Vance materials are issued by Eaton Vance Management (International) Limited (“EVMI”) 125 Old Broad Street, London, EC2N 1AR, UK, which is authorised and regulated in the United Kingdom by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Italy: MSIM FMIL (Milan Branch), (Sede Secondaria di Milano) Palazzo Serbelloni Corso Venezia, 16 20121 Milano, Italy. The Netherlands: MSIM FMIL (Amsterdam Branch), Rembrandt Tower, 11th Floor Amstelplein 1 1096HA, Netherlands. France: MSIM FMIL (Paris Branch), 61 rue de Monceau 75008 Paris, France. Spain: MSIM FMIL (Madrid Branch), Calle Serrano 55, 28006, Madrid, Spain. Germany: MSIM Fund Management (Ireland) Limited Frankfurt Branch, Große Gallusstraße 18, 60312 Frankfurt am Main, Germany (Gattung: Zweigniederlassung (FDI) gem. § 53b KWG).


Dubai: MSIM Ltd (Representative Office, Unit Precinct 3-7th Floor-Unit 701 and 702, Level 7, Gate Precinct Building 3, Dubai International Financial Centre, Dubai, 506501, United Arab Emirates. Telephone: +97 (0)14 709 7158).



Hong Kong: This material is disseminated by Morgan Stanley Asia Limited for use in Hong Kong and shall only be made available to “professional investors” as defined under the Securities and Futures Ordinance of Hong Kong (Cap 571). The contents of this material have not been reviewed nor approved by any regulatory authority including the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Accordingly, save where an exemption is available under the relevant law, this material shall not be issued, circulated, distributed, directed at, or made available to, the public in Hong Kong. Singapore: This material is disseminated by Morgan Stanley Investment Management Company and may not be circulated or distributed, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than to (i) an accredited investor (ii) an expert investor or (iii) an institutional investor as defined in Section 4A of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (“SFA”); or (iv) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA. This publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Australia: This material is disseminated in Australia by Morgan Stanley Investment Management (Australia) Pty Limited ACN: 122040037, AFSL No. 314182, which accept responsibility for its contents. This publication, and any access to it, is intended only for “wholesale clients” within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act. Calvert Research and Management, ARBN 635 157 434 is regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under U.S. laws which differ from Australian laws. Calvert Research and Management is exempt from the requirement to hold an Australian financial services licence in accordance with class order 03/1100 in respect of the provision of financial services to wholesale clients in Australia.


For professional investors, this document is circulated or distributed for informational purposes only. For those who are not professional investors, this document is provided in relation to Morgan Stanley Investment Management (Japan) Co., Ltd. (“MSIMJ”)’s business with respect to discretionary investment management agreements (“IMA”) and investment advisory agreements (“IAA”). This is not for the purpose of a recommendation or solicitation of transactions or offers any particular financial instruments. Under an IMA, with respect to management of assets of a client, the client prescribes basic management policies in advance and commissions MSIMJ to make all investment decisions based on an analysis of the value, etc. of the securities, and MSIMJ accepts such commission. The client shall delegate to MSIMJ the authorities necessary for making investment. MSIMJ exercises the delegated authorities based on investment decisions of MSIMJ, and the client shall not make individual instructions. All investment profits and losses belong to the clients; principal is not guaranteed. Please consider the investment objectives and nature of risks before investing. As an investment advisory fee for an IAA or an IMA, the amount of assets subject to the contract multiplied by a certain rate (the upper limit is 2.20% per annum (including tax)) shall be incurred in proportion to the contract period. For some strategies, a contingency fee may be incurred in addition to the fee mentioned above. Indirect charges also may be incurred, such as brokerage commissions for incorporated securities. Since these charges and expenses are different depending on a contract and other factors, MSIMJ cannot present the rates, upper limits, etc. in advance. All clients should read the Documents Provided Prior to the Conclusion of a Contract carefully before executing an agreement. This document is disseminated in Japan by MSIMJ, Registered No. 410 (Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firms)), Membership: The Japan Securities Dealers Association, the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association and the Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association.


This is a Marketing Communication.

It is important that users read the Terms of Use before proceeding as it explains certain legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to the dissemination of information pertaining to Morgan Stanley Investment Management's investment products.

The services described on this website may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all persons. For further details, please see our Terms of Use.

Privacy & Cookies    •    Terms of Use

©  Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved.