Market Pulse
  •  
March 11, 2020
Energy Market Turmoil: What's Next?
 

Market Pulse

Energy Market Turmoil: What's Next?

Energy Market Turmoil: What's Next?

Share Icon

March 11, 2020

 
 

March 9 saw the biggest one-day drop in oil prices in 30 years. After what was supposed to be a coordinated supply cut by OPEC+ to balance markets and keep oil prices high (oil prices had been falling due to decreased demand globally due to the coronavirus), Saudi Arabia and Russia instigated an oil price war. Instead of a coordinated cut, Russia refused to cooperate, as they viewed previous OPEC+ cuts as having aided America’s U.S. shale industry. Saudi Arabia reacted by announcing aggressive plans to boost oil output next month to well above current output levels and slashed prices for crude oil sent to Asia, Europe and the U.S., cutting oil prices and enticing refiners to use Saudi crude.

 
 
 
Display 1: Record Oil Volatility: Volatility soars as oil markets deal with simultaneous supply and demand shocks
9818021-Chart
 

Source: Bloomberg, Cboe Global Markets as of 3/10/2020

 
 

What Caused the Collapse in Negotiations and Saudi Arabia’s Aggressive Response?
Analysts suggest that Russia’s refusal to agree to further cuts in oil production stem from its view that the current agreement with OPEC+ was too one-sided against Russia. In the Kremlin’s view, production cuts only furthered the interest of American shale oil producers. Russia is particularly sensitive to helping American interests given they are under renewed pressure from U.S. sanctions.

Saudi Arabia’s reaction appears to be aimed at increasing market share, given its cost advantage over other oil-producing economies, as well as enhancing its credibility as a key enforcer of the cartel.

Where From Here?
Baseline Scenario: Significant Costs on Both Sides
In our baseline scenario, we see a war-of-attrition scenario where Saudi Arabia follows up on its threat to increase production, and Russia sticks to its position. This scenario, if maintained for long enough, would entail a significant economic cost on both sides (as well as for other oil exporting countries).  

We think Russia has the upper hand. The country has a much more solid macroeconomic framework than Saudi Arabia: it features a floating exchange rate regime that allows the economy to cushion the impact on growth from negative external shocks. In Saudi Arabia, they use a rigid FX system, where negative external shocks lead to loss of reserves and a much more costly adjustment in economic activity. Furthermore, Russia has a much stronger fiscal situation than Saudi Arabia. Russia ran a budget surplus last year versus a large fiscal deficit in Saudi Arabia, which translates into a much lower fiscal break-even oil (Russia at $40/barrel vs. Saudi Arabia at $84/barrel). In addition, reserve levels in Russia are higher than in Saudi Arabia ($570 billion, comprising of Central Bank Reserves and assets in the National Wellbeing Fund vs about $500 billion in Saudi Arabia). In addition, debt metrics in Russia are slightly better than in Saudi Arabia, both in terms of public debt/GDP and on gross external debt levels). Finally, it is our view that the leadership in Russia appears to be more stable and less prone to impulsive decisions.

Benign Scenario: Posturing Ahead of Negotiations
A more benign interpretation of the recent developments is that the parties are adopting a tougher stance ahead of potential new meetings before the April deadline. However, this is not our baseline as we have not heard of any planned meetings between representatives of Russia and Saudi Arabia, though it is true that the Russian Energy Minister has not ruled out further talks with OPEC nations aimed at stabilizing energy markets. On the Russia side, a strong macroeconomic framework should allow it to resist the pressure from lower oil prices, whereas in the case of Saudi Arabia, the kingdom already demonstrated a determined approach to gain market shares despite the economic pain from lower prices. Admittedly, Saudi Arabia was in a more robust position back then than today, as oil prices were above $100. From a reputational perspective, backtracking on Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase volume would undermine their credibility as the key enforcer of the OPEC cartel.

Market Impact
Corporates
We believe the key difference between the oil price drop now versus in 2014 and 2015 is that it potentially is a demand (Coronavirus) and supply issue at the same time. If prices remain low, liquidity concerns and bankruptcy risk will rise for oil leveraged Energy & Production (E&P) and Oilfield Services companies. On March 9, higher quality, High Yield E&Ps bonds were down 10-15 points while mid-tier and distressed/lower tier were trading down 20-30 points. IG HY spread moves ranged from 90bps wider for higher quality single A names, to 350bps wider for higher beta credits. 

In our view, while HY E&P will likely see significant defaults in the coming months and recoveries will be low, there will be survivors in HY Energy. Many of the higher quality Permian players have the financial means to ride out this downturn. We would also not be surprised to see “shotgun marriages” hit the tape over the coming days and weeks. This could cause some relief, especially if larger investment grade (IG) companies are the dance partner of a high yield (HY) company. 

IG independent oil producers are in a much better shape than the last downturn, in terms of having lower leverage, limited near-term maturities and much more capital disciplined management teams. The negative angle to the situation now versus past cycles (e.g., 2015/2016) is that equity valuations are very weak in the sector overall and there is limited support from equity investors, providing less of a cushion. Fallen angel risk is something to carefully consider in this environment, as it is possible several large IG energy names could see their ratings downgraded. 

Given rating agencies rate energy companies based off of price assumptions or “price decks,” all of their previous assumptions will have to be revisited and potentially rerun using lower price assumptions. Importantly, S&P is taking a conservative approach, and has revised their 2020 oil price deck down to $35/bbl from $55/bbl WTI. As a result, a few downgrades should be expected to HY but will not be broad based. On the flip side, Moody’s is being more tolerant (very dissimilar to their approach in 2015/2016) and currently have no plans to change their current price band of $50-70/bbl WTI. Instead, they are giving a three to six month window of these current low prices, before reassessing. 

Given the historic moves in oil, we are closely monitoring the energy positioning in our portfolios and are evaluating these companies’ ability to operate for an extended period of time in a low oil price environment. 

Emerging Markets
Lower oil prices will affect emerging market (EM) economies in a dissimilar fashion, depending on their status of oil-exporter or importer. The obvious winners are the importing countries of Turkey and Central and Eastern Europe, as well as selected countries in Asia (China, India, Philippines, Thailand, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka). We believe these economies should see relief both on inflation (mainly in Turkey and CEE economies, where inflation is running above Central Bank targets) as well as external accounts (via lower oil import bills). In the losing end, oil-exporting nations will clearly suffer, though we think that some differentiation, even within this more homogenous category, should be made. In particular, countries featuring stronger fiscal and external balances (as evidenced by lower fiscal breakeven prices, per IMF) should fare better than those facing tighter fiscal space:

 
 
Display 2: Breakeven Oil Prices
(U.S. dollars per barrel)
  Average       Projections
  2000-2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
 
  Fiscal Breakeven Oil Price2
MENAP oil exporters    
Algeria 102.6 102.5 91.4 104.2 129.8 109
Bahrain 74.1 105.7 112.6 118.4 95.1 91.8
Iran, I.R. of 55.9 58.4 64.8 82 155.6 194.6
Iraq ... 46.3 42.3 45.4 62.5 60.3
Kuwait 43.8 43.4 45.7 54.2 54.3 54.7
Libya 70.4 244.5 102.8 95.6 94.8 99.7
Oman 62.5 101.7 96.9 99.5 87.3 87.6
Qatar 45 54 50.6 50.3 48.8 45.7
Saudi Arabia 78 96.4 83.7 88.6 86.5 83.6
United Arab Emirates 47.6 51.1 59.8 66.7 70.2 70
Yemen1 197.1 364 125 ... ... ...
CCA oil and gas exporters        
Azerbaijan 57.1 47.8 60.9 56.2 52 53.4
Kazakhstan 76.6 113.5 105.2 37.9 57.8 57.8
Turkmenistan 69.1 45.9 55.9 63.9 58.9 57.6
Uzbekistan ... ... ... ... ... ...
             
  External Breakeven Oil Price3
MENAP oil exporters    
Algeria 80.4 89.1 90 101.7 106.7 100.5
Bahrain 46.1 64.6 73.1 98.1 84 81.1
Iran, I.R. of 41.5 28.3 33.5 38.2 78.3 87.7
Iraq 69.2 45.9 45.4 53 62.9 59.4
Kuwait 34 46 43.1 48.6 51.8 50.4
Libya 53.4 74.2 43.5 65.8 58.4 58.8
Oman 43.6 75 85.8 78.3 74.9 72.2
Qatar 50.5 48.3 45.7 52 51 50.4
Saudi Arabia 58.3 48.8 49.9 46.7 54.2 55.3
United Arab Emirates 55.2 31.5 28.7 30.4 28.7 32.4
Yemen1 ... ... ... ... ... ...
CCA oil and gas exporters        
Azerbaijan 56.4 65.8 59.7 76.3 64 59.5
Kazakhstan 85.9 86.7 82.7 81.5 81.5 77.1
Turkmenistan 80.8 58.1 54 28.7 48.5 47.2
Uzbekistan ... ... ... ... ... ...
             
Sources: National authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.
1Yemen is a net oil importer in 2015 and 2016.
2The oil price at which the fiscal balance is zero.
3The oil price at which the current account balance is zero.
 
 

The IMF table does not report breakeven oil prices for oil exporters in SSA but sell-side analysts estimate Angola’s fiscal breakeven price at $60/barrel, whereas Nigeria’s budgeted oil price in 2020, at $57/barrel, is substantially above current market prices. 

Another source of differentiation is the FX regimes in place in exporting countries. With the exception of Russia and, to a lesser extent, Kazakhstan, which feature more flexible FX arrangements, oil-exporting countries tend to have hard pegs to the U.S. dollar, which limit countries’ ability to cushion the growth impact from negative terms of trade shock, and making them more vulnerable to balance of payment crisis as they have to accommodate those shocks via reserve depletion. Therefore, countries with lower stocks of reserves and rigid FX regimes are more vulnerable in a scenario of low oil prices for a prolonged period of time. 

Finally, this analysis does not consider the impact of stimulus (both monetary, and potentially fiscal) that could be unleashed soon to counter the negative effect of coronavirus on global economic growth, which could potentially cap the downside on oil prices if no agreement on restricting output is achieved by April.

 
 

Risk Considerations

There is no assurance that a Portfolio will achieve its investment objective. Portfolios are subject to market risk, which is the possibility that the market values of securities owned by the Portfolio will decline and may therefore be less than what you paid for them. Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this Portfolio. Please be aware that this Portfolio may be subject to certain additional risks. Fixed income securities are subject to the ability of an issuer to make timely principal and interest payments (credit risk), changes in interest rates (interest-rate risk), the creditworthiness of the issuer and general market liquidity (market risk). In a rising interest-rate environment, bond prices may fall and may result in periods of volatility and increased portfolio redemptions. In a declining interest-rate environment, the portfolio may generate less income. Longer-term securities may be more sensitive to interest rate changes. Mortgage- and asset-backed securities are sensitive to early prepayment risk and a higher risk of default, and may be hard to value and difficult to sell (liquidity risk). They are also subject to credit, market and interest rate risks. Certain U.S. government securities purchased by the Strategy, such as those issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. It is possible that these issuers will not have the funds to meet their payment obligations in the future. High-yield securities (“junk bonds”) are lower-rated securities that may have a higher degree of credit and liquidity risk. Public bank loans are subject to liquidity risk and the credit risks of lower-rated securities. Foreign securities are subject to currency, political, economic and market risks. The risks of investing in emerging market countries are greater than risks associated with investments in foreign developed countries. Sovereign debt securities are subject to default risk. Derivative instruments may disproportionately increase losses and have a significant impact on performance. They also may be subject to counterparty, liquidity, valuation, correlation and market risks. Restricted and illiquid securities may be more difficult to sell and value than publicly traded securities (liquidity risk).

 
mariano.pando
Executive Director
Global Fixed Income Team
 
angie.salam
Executive Director
Global Fixed Income Team
 
joseph.hurley
Executive Director
Global Fixed Income Team
 
 
 
 

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES:

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The views, opinions, forecasts and estimates expressed of the author or the investment team as of the date of preparation of this material and are subject to change at any time due to market, economic or other conditions. Furthermore, the views will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available or circumstances existing, or changes occurring, after the date of publication. The views expressed do not reflect the opinions of all portfolio managers at Morgan Stanley Investment Management (MSIM) or the views of the firm as a whole, and may not be reflected in all the strategies and products that the Firm offers.

Forecasts and/or estimates provided herein are subject to change and may not actually come to pass. Information regarding expected market returns and market outlooks is based on the research, analysis and opinions of the authors. These conclusions are speculative in nature and are not intended to predict the future performance of any specific Morgan Stanley Investment Management product.

Certain information herein is based on data obtained from third-party sources believed to be reliable. However, we have not verified this information, and we make no representations whatsoever as to its accuracy or completeness.

This material is a general communication, which is not impartial, and all information provided has been prepared solely for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute an offer or a recommendation to buy or sell any particular security or to adopt any specific investment strategy. The information herein has not been based on a consideration of any individual investor circumstances and is not investment advice, nor should it be construed in any way as tax, accounting, legal or regulatory advice. To that end, investors should seek independent legal and financial advice, including advice as to tax consequences, before making any investment decision.

This communication is not a product of Morgan Stanley’s Research Department and should not be regarded as a research recommendation. The information contained herein has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research.

DISTRIBUTION: This communication is only intended for and will be only distributed to persons resident in jurisdictions where such distribution or availability would not be contrary to local laws or regulations.

There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will work under all market conditions, and each investor should evaluate their ability to invest for the long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Prior to investing, investors should carefully review the strategy’s/product’s relevant offering document. There are important differences in how the strategy is carried out in each of the investment vehicles.

Ireland: Morgan Stanley Investment Management (Ireland) Limited. Registered Office: The Observatory, 7-11 Sir John Rogerson’s, Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland. Registered in Ireland under company number 616662. Regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. United Kingdom: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England. Registered No. 1981121. Registered Office: 25 Cabot Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 4QA. Dubai: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited (Representative Office, Unit Precinct 3-7th Floor-Unit 701 and 702, Level 7, Gate Precinct Building 3, Dubai International Financial Centre, Dubai, 506501, United Arab Emirates. Telephone: +97 (0)14 709 7158). Germany: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited Niederlassung Deutschland, Grosse Gallustrasse 18, 60312 Frankfurt am Main, Germany (Gattung: Zweigniederlassung (FDI) gem. § 53b KWG). Italy: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited, Milan Branch (Sede Secondaria di Milano) is a branch of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited, a company registered in the U.K., authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and whose registered office is at 25 Cabot Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4QA. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited Milan Branch (Sede Secondaria di Milano) with seat in Palazzo Serbelloni Corso Venezia, 16 20121 Milano, Italy, is registered in Italy with company number and VAT number 08829360968. The Netherlands: Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Rembrandt Tower, 11th Floor Amstelplein 1 1096HA, Netherlands. Telephone: 31 2-0462-1300. Morgan Stanley Investment Management is a branch office of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom. Switzerland: Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, London, Zurich BranchI Authorised and regulated by the Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht (“FINMA”). Registered with the Register of Commerce Zurich CHE-115.415.770. Registered Office: Beethovenstrasse 33, 8002 Zurich, Switzerland, Telephone +41 (0) 44 588 1000. Facsimile: +41 (0) 44 588 1074.

Hong Kong: This document has been issued by Morgan Stanley Asia Limited for use in Hong Kong and shall only be made available to “professional investors” as defined under the Securities and Futures Ordinance of Hong Kong (Cap 571). The contents of this document have not been reviewed nor approved by any regulatory authority including the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Accordingly, save where an exemption is available under the relevant law, this document shall not be issued, circulated, distributed, directed at, or made available to, the public in Hong Kong. Singapore: This document should not be considered to be the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to the public or any member of the public in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under section 304 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (“SFA”); (ii) to a “relevant person” (which includes an accredited investor) pursuant to section 305 of the SFA, and such distribution is in accordance with the conditions specified in section 305 of the SFA; or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA. This publication has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Australia: This publication is disseminated in Australia by Morgan Stanley Investment Management (Australia) Pty Limited ACN: 122040037, AFSL No. 314182, which accept responsibility for its contents. This publication, and any access to it, is intended only for “wholesale clients” within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act.

Japan: For professional investors, this document is circulated or distributed for informational purposes only. For those who are not professional investors, this document is provided in relation to Morgan Stanley Investment Management (Japan) Co., Ltd. (“MSIMJ”)’s business with respect to discretionary investment management agreements (“IMA”) and investment advisory agreements (“IAA”). This is not for the purpose of a recommendation or solicitation of transactions or offers any particular financial instruments. Under an IMA, with respect to management of assets of a client, the client prescribes basic management policies in advance and commissions MSIMJ to make all investment decisions based on an analysis of the value, etc. of the securities, and MSIMJ accepts such commission. The client shall delegate to MSIMJ the authorities necessary for making investment. MSIMJ exercises the delegated authorities based on investment decisions of MSIMJ, and the client shall not make individual instructions. All investment profits and losses belong to the clients; principal is not guaranteed. Please consider the investment objectives and nature of risks before investing. As an investment advisory fee for an IAA or an IMA, the amount of assets subject to the contract multiplied by a certain rate (the upper limit is 2.20% per annum (including tax)) shall be incurred in proportion to the contract period. For some strategies, a contingency fee may be incurred in addition to the fee mentioned above. Indirect charges also may be incurred, such as brokerage commissions for incorporated securities. Since these charges and expenses are different depending on a contract and other factors, MSIMJ cannot present the rates, upper limits, etc. in advance. All clients should read the Documents Provided Prior to the Conclusion of a Contract carefully before executing an agreement. This document is disseminated in Japan by MSIMJ, Registered No. 410 (Director of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firms)), Membership: The Japan Securities Dealers Association, the Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association and the Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association.

U.S.: A separately managed account may not be suitable for all investors. Separate accounts managed according to the Strategy include a number of securities and will not necessarily track the performance of any index. Please consider the investment objectives, risks and fees of the Strategy carefully before investing. A minimum asset level is required. For important information about the investment manager, please refer to Form ADV Part 2.

Please consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of the fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the fund. To obtain a prospectus, download one at morganstanley.com/im or call 1-800-548-7786. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.

Morgan Stanley Distribution, Inc. serves as the distributor for Morgan Stanley funds.

NOT FDIC INSURED | OFFER NOT BANK GUARANTEED | MAY LOSE VALUE | NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY | NOT A BANK DEPOSIT

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: EMEA: This communication has been issued by Morgan Stanley Investment Management Limited (“MSIM”). Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England No. 1981121. Registered Office: 25 Cabot Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 4QA.

MSIM has not authorised financial intermediaries to use and to distribute this document, unless such use and distribution is made in accordance with applicable law and regulation. Additionally, financial intermediaries are required to satisfy themselves that the information in this document is suitable for any person to whom they provide this document in view of that person’s circumstances and purpose. MSIM shall not be liable for, and accepts no liability for, the use or misuse of this document by any such financial intermediary.

This document may be translated into other languages. Where such a translation is made this English version remains definitive. If there are any discrepancies between the English version and any version of this document in another language, the English version shall prevail.

The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without MSIM’s express written consent.

Morgan Stanley Investment Management is the asset management division of Morgan Stanley.

All information contained herein is proprietary and is protected under copyright law.

 

It is important that users read the Terms of Use before proceeding as it explains certain legal and regulatory restrictions applicable to the dissemination of information pertaining to Morgan Stanley Investment Management's investment products.

The services described on this website may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all persons. For further details, please see our Terms of Use.

Not FDIC Insured—Offer No Bank Guarantee—May Lose Value
Not Insured By Any Federal Government Agency—Not A Deposit

Privacy & Cookies    •    Terms of Use

©  Morgan Stanley. All rights reserved.

Morgan Stanley Distribution, Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC.