Insights
Earnings Era: Future Performance in Private Equity
|
Insight Article
|
• |
September 28, 2022
|
September 28, 2022
|
Earnings Era: Future Performance in Private Equity |
With the world of finance at another major turning point, asset owners are increasingly allocating to alternatives such as private equity (PE) to meet their long-term investment objectives. The trend may become more pronounced, as recent volatility in public markets adds to the appeal of private assets. At this critical juncture for markets, however, allocation decisions are not straightforward and asset owners must confront a host of questions as they evaluate prospective managers. For instance, what investment style is best suited for generating returns in today’s changed investment landscape and how will cyclical drivers affect performance? Should limited partners (LPs) increase PE exposure now or wait until volatility dissipates?
Key Takeaways
Understanding Performance Drivers
Monetary tightening, fiscal retrenchment and supply-side disruptions are together reducing global demand. The slowdown in economic activity, together with higher inflation and rising interest rates, has shaken global equity markets, pushing them into bear market territory. Pre-Covid, investors were already looking to increase their allocations to alternatives to meet their long-term investment objectives (e.g., private equity AUM is forecast to double by 2025 from $4.42 trillion in 2020).1 Given the current volatile investment climate, this trend can only be expected to accelerate, as the value add from stable private equity returns in an investment portfolio has become increasingly clear.
To put the health of private equity markets and long-term return trends into context, we need to understand:
Below, we analyze the three performance contributors driving long-term return trends—leverage, multiple expansion and earnings—and investigate how current conditions for each factor may shape returns into the future.
Leverage. Prior to the global financial crisis (GFC), leverage contributed 50% to 70% of PE returns, before gradually declining to 25% in the decade following the crisis.2 Post-GFC, leverage edged up to reach roughly seven times EBITDA by the early 2020s from just over five times a decade ago (Display 1). Falling global interest rates and low financing costs made higher leverage possible. Accordingly, as rates have begun to rise, the impact of higher financing costs may become a headwind, particularly for businesses with high gearing. As a result, capital structure health will become key for general partners (GPs) evaluating prospective investments. In the leveraged loan market, an important financing source for PE transactions, technicals and fundamentals have become slightly less supportive but remain healthy compared to historical levels. Default and distress ratios are low at 0.28% and 2.81% respectively but are slowly trending upward. Interest coverage has slipped in line with higher rates but remains adequate at over four and a half times earnings before interest and taxes. Against this backdrop, the market is arguably well placed to weather an outlook for higher rates. That said, financing conditions are becoming more restrictive, signalling that leverage and its contribution to PE returns is likely to be lower than we have seen in the past 20 years.
Source: Floating Rate Loan team, at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. As at 30 June 2022.
Multiple expansion. Just as low interest rates facilitated rising leverage, the willingness of lenders to back deals also sustained buoyant valuations, helping multiple expansion contribute 28% to PE returns in the decade following the financial crisis.3 As rates continue to rise and credit conditions become potentially less supportive, simply relying on multiple expansion will not be enough to drive returns. Of course, lower entry multiples may present a buying opportunity for flush GPs (Display 2), though, PE sellers may also face exit headwinds, admittedly. As we have seen in past downturns, GPs may opt to delay divestments until better conditions prevail, which may also cause structures such as secondaries or continuation funds to see stronger growth as GPs seek to avoid forced exits. Importantly, we do not expect multiple expansion to drive returns as much as it has over the past 20 years in an environment of rising interest rates, which places an added emphasis on capturing value at entry in transactions.
Sources: S&P LCD Comps LBO Review Q2 22 and Capital IQ. The S&P 500 is an American stock market index based on the market capitalizations of
500 large companies having common stock listed on the NYSE and the NASDAQ. Data as of 30 June 2022.
EBITDA growth. Earnings has become the most important value driver for private equity, particularly in the post-2008 crisis period. In the decade following the GFC, revenue growth and margin expansion accounted for 37% and 10% for a total 47% contribution from EBITDA growth (Display 3). As indicated above, multiple compression and rising debt costs will likely see earnings increase its importance as a source of value creation even further. Accordingly, GPs will need a credible growth strategy in order to create value for LPs. In our view, buy-and-build strategies will be key to unlocking stronger revenue growth and maximizing operational efficiencies, as they help to grow scale and capture synergies. Such an investment approach is repeatable and often allows for add-on acquisitions at below headline valuation multiples. Other avenues of value creation may include partnering with founders in the mid-market (particularly, those seeking support from financial investors for the first time) and reducing operational vulnerabilities to make businesses less sensitive to economic headwinds.
Source: “Performance Analysis and Attribution with Alternative Investments.” Institute for Private Capital. 12 February 2022.
Note: MOIC = Multiple on Invested Capital.
The Importance of Market Timing
Staying the Course
Private market investments tend to be long-term by design. However, during periods of market stress, short-term pressures can cause investors to veer away from long-term investment planning. At the same time, market corrections tend to slow future commitments, as investors focus on more volatile liquid investments or face constraints related to the so-called “denominator effect,” which typically occurs when sharp falls in public markets result in higher portfolio exposures to less liquid asset classes.
As Morgan Stanley Investment Management’s Portfolio Solutions Group (PSG) noted in “Post-Crisis Private Markets Investing,” PE vintages following the immediate onset of a crisis (2001-2004, 2009-2012) outperformed late-cycle vintages (1998-2000, 2005-2007) by an average of 64% on a median net IRR basis.5 As can be seen in the below chart (Display 4), private equity also outperformed its public market equivalent (PME) consistently and regardless of market conditions. In fact, the magnitude of outperformance suggests investors would have garnered higher returns by upping PE allocations and decreasing their public equities exposure in times of crisis.
Source: Cambridge Associates. As of 31 March 2022.
The PSG paper also highlighted the wide dispersion in returns between private equity managers, which historically has widened in post-crisis markets: In 2003, the spread between top and bottom quartile fund performance was 18% wider year-on-year and peaked at 72% in 2009 compared to the previous year.6
Turning to fundraising, history shows that commitments to private equity have traditionally fallen in downcycles. Accordingly, we may see a short-term dip in fundraising while market conditions remain challenging. Furthermore, it is also probable that some institutional investors now find themselves slightly over-allocated to PE due to the sharp swings in public market valuations, which may cause the denominator effect to temporarily impede future commitments.
All of that being said, dry powder remains at record levels of $3.6 trillion and GPs will be eager to draw down this capital to put to work in deals.7 This should sustain competition for assets, particularly in the large-cap space (Display 5), which makes deal origination and value at entry key to PE value creation. As the large-cap LBO market often attracts the greatest amount of capital, specialists in mid-market deals may be better placed to source investments with greater potential for upside.
Source: Cambridge Associates. As of 31 March 2022.
Source: Cambridge Associates. As of 31 March 2022.
Conclusion
In summary, we believe that investors should prepare for an environment where neither multiple expansion nor leverage contribute significantly to performance, which means GP skilfulness in operations will matter more. We expect GP performance dispersion to increase, as the changing composition to returns benefits some managers and challenges others.
While current market conditions remain challenging, we believe that private equity is well placed for future growth and will reward investors allocating to the asset class. In our view, the historical evidence supports staying the course, as PE has managed to absorb market dislocations and capitalize on interesting entry points. PE is showing the most growth potential among private assets and will very likely account for nearly 70% of alternatives AUM by 2025, according to Preqin.8 As it is, PE fundraising has been strong thanks to the asset class’s exceptionally robust performance over the past decade.
While the denominator effect may slow fresh commitments from LPs, longer-term allocations will likely rise as this constraint eases and new investors come into the market. Tactically, after the initial shock of the Covid pandemic, investor sentiment turned towards opportunities in an environment of capital scarcity. Ahead, we would expect investors with capacity for new investments to remain active and seek to benefit from dislocation vintages.
For investors looking to deploy capital and select GPs, the private equity universe is not a panacea and sector and manager selection will likely become much more important. There will be elements of stress and fewer tailwinds, but it should favour long-term investors and GPs who can create value through operational improvements.
Risk Considerations
Historical performance information is not indicative of future results, and the historical performance information in this paper should not be viewed as an indicator of any future performance that may be achieved as a result of implementing an investment strategy substantially identical or similar to that described in this paper.
Alternative investments are speculative and include a high degree of risk. Investors could lose all, or a substantial amount, of their investment. Alternative instruments are suitable only for long-term investors willing to forgo liquidity and put capital at risk for an indefinite period of time. Alternative investments are typically highly illiquid—there is no secondary market for private funds, and there may be restrictions on redemptions or the assignment or other transfer of investments in private funds. Alternative investments often utilize leverage and other speculative practices that may increase volatility and risk of loss. Financial intermediaries are required to satisfy themselves that the information in this document is suitable for any person to whom they provide this document in view of that person’s circumstances and purpose. Morgan Stanley Investment Management (MSIM), its affiliates and its and their respective directors, officers, members, partners, employees, agents, advisors, representatives, heirs and successors shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any person’s or entity’s receipt, use of or reliance upon this document or any information contained herein. If such a person considers an investment, she/he should always ensure that she/he has satisfied herself/himself that she/he has been properly advised by that financial intermediary about the suitability of an investment.
|
Managing Director
|
|
Executive Director
|