Takeaways & Key Expectations
August 14, 2023
Equity Market Commentary - August 2023
August 14, 2023
We listen to you!
One of the many aspects of this business I love is the relationship between corporate fundamentals and behavioral finance and its net impact on stock prices. Anyone who follows us is likely aware of that.
As it pertains to corporate fundamentals, my team and I spend a huge portion of our day listening to calls, reading reports, and analysing companies.
On the behavioral side, I am enormously fortunate to have such a great group of readers who are on the front lines working with clients directly. I greatly value their feedback.
What does that have to do with this Slimmon’s TAKE?
When Leslie or I receive consistent feedback from those of you on the front lines, we listen:
Those are just two of many comments.
Let’s rewind back to February 2021 when, after 11 months of selling equities off the covid-lows and a 66% rally in the S&P 500, retail fund flows turned positive. Investors decided to show up to the party.
Now, fast forward to last year’s bear market. Flows turned consistently negative in September 2022 and have remained so despite a 26% rally off the October 12th, 2022, low.2
Therefore, I assumed that given we are nearing the one-year anniversary of “selling after a bear market”, it was time for investors to flip, as they did in 2021.
However, I neglected to factor in one key difference that many of you have pointed out:
The pain of missing out on the equity rally and sitting with cash was far more acute in 2021 than it is today.
In my opinion, there are two implications:
Could #2 possibly be wrong and retail investors will simply miss out on this rally altogether?
As I often say, the only consistency to the investing business is the fear-to-greed-to-fear cycle. To say the greed part of the cycle will not emerge at some point is to say, “this time is different”. It simply must happen.
However, maybe we are not yet at that February 2021 juncture?
The only question in my mind is, how much does the equity market need to move up before a 5.25% in Treasury yield starts to look less attractive in comparison, thereby unleashing that cash? (Feel free to weigh in with an opinion!)
My thesis that equities will be higher into year-end is also predicated on the positive inflection in quarterly year-over-year earnings growth.
As I pointed out in our January webcast, stocks rally in down earnings years, most of the time. But why? Two reasons:
I think it’s quite likely #2 is yet to come. The bottom-up 2023 consensus estimates went up after the Q2 earnings season, not down as the bears had predicted.5
That’s important because consensus is estimating a 12% earnings recovery next year from $220 to $246. And given Q2 came in strong, there were no cuts to that $246 estimate.
As it appears today, the S&P 500 will inflect from -6% year-over-year negative earnings growth in Q2 to +8% year-over-year positive earnings growth in Q4.
Negative to positive inflections tend to be greeted warmly by investors.
But that is not the only potential catalyst for equities later this year.
The other big one is old Joe in the White House, who will be running for re-election next year. Remember that our President has been in DC for 50 years. He knows it’s all about “the economy, stupid” in the year of the election.
Old Joe understands he needs to pump the economy next year. As Dan Clifton, Washington strategist at Strategas writes:
“Biden’s big spending initiatives: Infrastructure, Clean Energy and Chips do not Kick in until 2024.”6
We hear this from our infrastructure plays. They are all awaiting the billions of earmarked infrastructure money, expecting to see flows really turn on early next year.
Meanwhile, when asked about the $52.7 billion Chips Act, Secretary of Commerce Raimondo said just recently:
We will start to give out the money later (Q4) this year.7
These public works programs should be big kickers for industrials, materials, semi-equipment, and other sectors. Not to mention, despite the debt ceiling etc., I expect the President, will find further ways to ingratiate himself to voters. $$$
Hence, we remain confident on the rest of the year, although I concede, we are wary from now until Q4. The market could be more volatile than I had previously anticipated. The bears have been put through the ringer and are perhaps due for a respite.
Finally, I want to address a comment I hear often, with which I take issue: “Stocks are Expensive.”
As you can see from the following chart, yes, the S&P 500 is more expensive than its average.
However, that’s only because a few big names are pulling up the numbers.
Most stocks in the S&P 500 are cheaper than average, as evidenced by the S&P 500 equal-weight index. The same is the case for both mid-caps and small-caps.
Obviously, P/E is just one metric to use. Yet there are plenty of fertile equity opportunities out there. Do not let blanket statements by the bear crowd scare you.
As hard as it might be to believe, given the run in the mega-caps, the S&P 500 equal-weight has outperformed the S&P 500 over time.8
That is why our US Core, and the US portion of our global products not only have exposure to the mega-caps but also to the mid-caps within the S&P 500.
No doubt, having more S&P 500 equal-weight exposure has been painful YTD, given the tremendous outperformance of the mega-caps.
However, we believe the combination of cheaper valuations and some reversion to the mean (time for the rest of the market to catch up) does give us confidence looking forward.
The index performance is provided for illustrative purposes only and is not meant to depict the performance of a specific investment. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.