Short Comment on LDP Study Group on Proposals for Stock Market Measures
January 24, 2008
By Robert Alan Feldman | Tokyo
The ‘market support measures’ proposed by the LDP study group are not so much market support measures (a.k.a PKO – for ‘price keep operations’) as policies aimed at correcting structural deficiencies and enhancing financial sector competitiveness (a.k.a FBM – foundation-building measures). As such, the LDP group appears to be taking the market drop as a proactive opportunity to promote a structural agenda.
For example, one proposal, the establishment of a sovereign wealth fund (SWF) for Japan, is hardly a measure that can directly buy stocks in the short term, even if the structure of such a fund were to allow such purchases. Rather, the SWF would be a vehicle for funds now invested in low-return assets to move into higher-return assets, and to increase Tokyo's standing as a global financial center. Any Japanese SWF would likely be created with rules to prevent political interference, and the fear of PKO – while understandable – is likely exaggerated. Another proposal, promoting the switch to outsiders on Boards of Directors, is aimed at improving corporate governance, and reducing the temptation for back-scratching among existing management. This proposal, if implemented, would enhance the value of companies, with the expectation that better value would be reflected in price. The proposal for BoJ to go back to zero interest rates, while radical, is a wake-up call for reconsideration of where deflation – particularly wage deflation – is taking the country, rather than a measure that can have a direct effect on stocks. The proposal to reduce dividends revives a debate from two years ago; dividend taxed had been lowered from 20% to 10%, and a group in the LDP wanted them to revert to 20%; another group wanted them eliminated, on the argument that dividend taxes are double taxation of the corporate income (since dividends are paid from after-tax profits). While putting a target of 18,000 for the equity market into this proposal shades the idea with ‘market support’ color, the basic idea is sound. Passing the tax-related budget proposals before the start of the new fiscal year is just sound policy; the call for such action merely reminds politicians that they cannot play political games with the budget, and expect investors to ignore such games. Rather than market support, this item is ‘political education’. In short, these proposals from the LDP study group are the first shot in a Response phase in the CRIC cycle (the cycle of crisis, response, improvement and complacency that characterizes the interaction of policy and the economy). These proposals are structural in nature, move in the direction of sound policy, and hence should not be considered a reversion to old patterns. Investors should, in my opinion, welcome these proposals, not only because of their structural content but also because they prove that at least part of the Diet remains actively engaged in the fight for structural reform.
Important Disclosure Information at the end of this Forum
Realising an Imported Soft Landing
January 24, 2008
By Denise Yam, CFA | Hong Kong
Commencing on an imported soft landing in 4Q07: The Chinese economy appears to have commenced on an imported soft landing in 4Q07, as slower export growth (+22.2%Y in 4Q versus +26.2% in 3Q) cooled overall real GDP growth to 11.2%Y, from 11.5% in 3Q. We estimate that the contribution to overall GDP growth from the expansion of the trade surplus scaled back to just 0.3 percentage points in 4Q, compared to an average of 2.6 ppts over the preceding six quarters. Needless to say, sustained vigor in domestic demand contributed an increasing share of overall growth, at 10.9 ppts in 4Q, by our estimates. Real economic activity maintained robust growth, supported by domestic demand: Industrial output growth, though slowing from 18.1% in 3Q, sustained a robust pace of 17.5% in 4Q (+17.4% in December). Domestic consumer demand continued to demonstrate strength, surging 20.2%Y in December, accelerating from 18.8% in November despite the ease in retail inflation in the month (+5.6% in December versus +6% in November). Fixed asset investment, on the other hand, showed some gradual deceleration in line with slower loan growth. Overall fixed asset investment in the whole economy grew 24.8% in the full year (down from 25.7% in January-September) to Rmb13.7 trillion, faster than the 24% gain in 2006. Urban FAI concluded the year gaining 25.8% (Rmb11.7 trillion), also faster than that in 2006 (+24.5%), but dipping from 26.8% in the first 11 months. Inflationary pressures persist, justifying tight policy stance in the short term... CPI inflation moderated to 6.5%Y in December, from 6.9% in November, mainly reflecting some softening in food price inflation to around 16% (estimated from full year figure of 12.3%), from 18.2% in November. Food inflation accounted for 4 ppts, or 83% of overall inflation in 2007, while non-food inflation averaged just 1.1%. The acceleration in upstream inflation in December (PPI +5.4% versus +4.6% in November, RMPPI +8.1% versus +6.3% in November) serves as a reminder that inflation pressures are still persistent, justifying the maintenance of a tight policy stance in the short term. In our view, cooling money supply will remain a key tool to rein in inflation as well as inflationary expectations. We believe that, looking ahead, inflation should respond to slower monetary growth and government price controls, though with a time lag. We forecast CPI inflation to come under control in the course of the year, averaging 4.5% in 2008. ... but external weakness to allow earlier policy easing: We believe that the latest data perfectly demonstrate the dichotomy we have been looking for – external weakness and domestic strength – which strengthens our call for an imported soft landing this year (see Journey Into Autumn: An Imported Soft Landing in 2008, December 4, 2007). In the face of slowing external demand amid an imminent recession in the US economy, we forecast export growth to slow to 16% in 2008, and that the net exports contribution to GDP growth will dip to only 0.5ppt, from over 2 ppts in the last three years. In other words, external weakness will help cool the Chinese economy without further aggressive tightening actions through blunt policy instruments by the government. Reiterating our call for an imported soft landing: The aggressive 75bp inter-meeting rate cut by the US Fed served as a wake-up call for Chinese policymakers, in our view, ensuring that they fully appreciate the downside risks facing the US economy, and would appropriately consider easing the existing policy controls as a first line of defense. In particular, we have changed our original PBoC call from “two more rate hikes in 1H08” to “no rate hike” in 2008 in response to the latest Fed rate cut. We believe that the sharp rate cut by the Fed has limited the room for China to hike rates, mainly because of the rise in sterilization costs of the PBoC’s open market operations. We believe that the PBoC will have to rely more on other measures (e.g., RRR hikes and administrative credit controls, and possibly complemented by faster RMB appreciation) to control liquidity and ease inflationary pressures. This is lowering the probability of “over-tightening by policy mistake” that we had feared before (see Two Types of Over-tightening, January 4, 2008). We reiterate our call for an imported soft landing as the baseline scenario for 2008 and maintain our forecast of China’s GDP growth decelerating to 10%.
Important Disclosure Information at the end of this Forum
Disclosure Statement
The information and opinions in this report were prepared or are disseminated by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and/or Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc and/or Morgan Stanley Japan Securities Co., Ltd. and/or Morgan Stanley Asia Limited and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte. (Registration number 199206298Z) and/or Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Securities Pte Ltd (Registration number 200008434H) and/or Morgan Stanley Taiwan Limited and/or Morgan Stanley & Co International plc, Seoul Branch, and/or Morgan Stanley Australia Limited (A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, holder of Australian financial services licence No. 233742, which accepts responsibility for its contents), and/or JM Morgan Stanley Securities Private Limited and their affiliates (collectively, "Morgan Stanley").
Global Research
Conflict Management Policy
This research observes our conflict management policy, available at www.morganstanley.com/institutional/research/management_policies.html
Important Disclosures
This report does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without regard to the circumstances and objectives of those who receive it. Morgan Stanley recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages them to seek a financial adviser's advice. The appropriateness of an investment or strategy will depend on an investor's circumstances and objectives. This report is not an offer to buy or sell any security or to participate in any trading strategy. The value of and income from your investments may vary because of changes in interest rates or foreign exchange rates, securities prices or market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies or other factors. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized.
With the exception of information regarding Morgan Stanley, reports prepared by Morgan Stanley research personnel are based on public information. Morgan Stanley makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. We have no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in this report change apart from when we intend to discontinue research coverage of a company. Facts and views in this report have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other Morgan Stanley business areas, including investment banking personnel.
To our readers in Taiwan: This publication is distributed by Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Taipei Branch; it may not be distributed to or quoted or used by the public media without the express written consent of Morgan Stanley. To our readers in Hong Kong: Information is distributed in Hong Kong by and on behalf of, and is attributable to, Morgan Stanley Asia Limited as part of its regulated activities in Hong Kong; if you have any queries concerning it, contact our Hong Kong sales representatives.
This publication is disseminated in Japan by Morgan Stanley Japan Securities Co., Ltd.; in Canada by Morgan Stanley Canada Limited, which has approved of, and has agreed to take responsibility for, the contents of this publication in Canada; in Germany by Morgan Stanley Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main, regulated by Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin); in Spain by Morgan Stanley, S.V., S.A., a Morgan Stanley group company, which is supervised by the Spanish Securities Markets Commission (CNMV) and states that this document has been written and distributed in accordance with the rules of conduct applicable to financial research as established under Spanish regulations; in the United States by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, which accepts responsibility for its contents. Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, authorized and regulated by Financial Services Authority, disseminates in the UK research that it has prepared, and approves solely for the purposes of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, research which has been prepared by any of its affiliates. Private U.K. investors should obtain the advice of their Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc representative about the investments concerned. In Australia, this report, and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act.
Trademarks and service marks herein are their owners' property. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations of the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of their data and shall not have liability for any damages relating to such data. The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and S&P. Morgan Stanley bases projections, opinions, forecasts and trading strategies regarding the MSCI Country Index Series solely on public information. MSCI has not reviewed, approved or endorsed these projections, opinions, forecasts and trading strategies. Morgan Stanley has no influence on or control over MSCI's index compilation decisions. This report or portions of it may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley research is disseminated and available primarily electronically, and, in some cases, in printed form. Additional information on recommended securities is available on request.
|
