Japan
Buckle Up – Turbulence Ahead (Part I)
December 12, 2007

By Takehiro Sato and Takeshi Yamaguchi | Tokyo, Tokyo

Decoupling notion prevails, but a sharp slowdown looks likely

Our US economics team has lowered its 2008 growth forecast all the way to 1.1% and expects a mild recession in the first half of 2008. Meanwhile, our economists covering emerging markets, including China, remain bullish. The decoupling notion – that major economies are likely to still do well even if the US economy slows, thanks to demand from emerging countries – has some support in the markets. In the case of Japan, however, this appears to be off because errant government policies and laws have started to hurt the economy, and the prospects for a convincing strong growth scenario are looking bleak, given not only overseas factors but also weak domestic demand. For our new base scenario, we expect economic growth to slow sharply to 0.9% in 2008 (1.1% in F3/09), and as a risk scenario we point out the possibility of zero growth.

Japan’s economy likely to be hit by a shock before domestic demand fully recovers

Given the weakness in domestic demand, Japan’s economy is all the more dependent on exports. We expect net foreign demand to account for 1.0ppt of our 1.8% estimate for real growth in 2007, given the weakness in real imports but strong growth in real exports. In addition, policy missteps have emerged as a new downside risk to growth. Under such circumstances, a US economic downturn in the first half of 2008 would be a new threat to Japan, and the foreign demand-driven growth scenario for Japan’s economy appears to be approaching a tipping point.

Most Japanese financial institutions have not been affected much by subprime mortgages, but overseas, the liquidity crunch has worsened in December, banks’ balance sheets have grown sharply as a result of a shift from direct financing, and it is even more difficult to issue CP now than in the summer, when the financial markets were in turmoil. These conditions could give rise to a sudden increase in credit costs, and the liquidity crunch could turn into a true credit crunch. Based on what happened in Japan in 1997-98, an economy with liquidity constraints would be fragile and companies are likely to suspend investment projects and hold onto liquidity. In this case, Japan’s economy would not be completely unscathed.

We see a few reasons to be optimistic, though. The US accounts for only a small portion of Japan’s real export growth; most of the growth is now accounted for by Asia and other emerging markets and Europe. Hence, any shocks from the US would probably not be as bad as they were after the tech bubble burst. Since most of Japan’s exports to Asia used to end up in the US, Europe or back in Japan, US economic downturns seriously hurt Japan. However, the amount of exports driven by demand in Asia, for autos and some production goods, for example, has recently risen sharply. Our China economics team believes that China will not be affected by a sharp slowdown in the US economy because the government, which has been struggling to rein in overheated growth, could simply ease up on its efforts to keep domestic demand in check. In addition, the biggest risk for China’s economy is domestic demand staying overheated, rather than a US economic downturn, because in the latter case, the government could boost spending to stimulate the economy. We hope accordingly that Japan’s economy will increasingly decouple from the US economy, with help from solid economic growth in Asia, and forecast only a mild recession, with real growth of around 1% in 2008 (F3/09). However, the economy may not grow at all if Asian economic growth slows sharply.

Risks of domestic demand weakening further because of government policies

Errant government policies have started to hurt domestic demand. First, the availability of consumer financing has dried up and micro businesses as well as small and midsize enterprises (SMEs) are having financing difficulties because Credit Guarantee Corporations (CGCs) started a ‘responsibility-sharing arrangement’ in October. Second, the revised Building Standards Law (BSL) has led to a sharp decline in construction starts. Third, consumption and investment sentiment has been further harmed by the prospect of higher taxes and a return to the 1990s-style fiscal policy. Implementation of the Specified Commercial Transactions Law and the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (FIEL) can probably be added to the mix too. The FIEL has hampered foreign investors and accelerated yen appreciation. Just to be clear, we do not think that the objectives of these policies are misguided, but hasty moves by bureaucrats to implement such laws, without regard for the economy, have had a considerable impact.

We think that such errant policies will result in a policy-induced slump (‘kansei fukyo’). First, the contraction in consumer credit and financing backed by CGCs has already put a tight squeeze on micro businesses and SMEs. With sharp increases in material and energy costs worsening the terms of trade and labor’s share of income still high, SMEs do not have much leeway to increase wages or capex. The tightening of credit may lead to an increase in bankruptcies among SMEs in Jan-Mar 2008, when cash flow tends to be tight.

Second, housing investment has fallen off sharply because of the revised BSL and is unlikely to recover in F3/09. The condominium market took a heavy hit, particularly since demand had already been weak amid a decline in what households can afford to purchase. Condo starts have slumped in 2007 and are unlikely to fully recover in 2008 because the bottlenecks that have resulted from government inadequacies are likely to take time to clear up. GDP-based housing investment will probably take longer to recover. We estimate the housing weakness alone shaves 0.3ppt from our F3/08 GDP growth forecast, and do not expect a rebound of the same extent in F3/09. If the situation continues until mid-2008, small and midsize builders are likely to go bankrupt and housing spending would be affected, and hence the problems would be more than just bottlenecks.

Third, the government’s discussion of taxes has chilled consumer and investor sentiment. The Cabinet Office’s Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy released an estimate that the consumption tax needs to be increased to double figures, and the government’s Tax Commission is considering raising tax rates and limiting deductibles against income. The need for such a major consumption tax increase is understandable, but we think that the way the idea was floated was not a smart one. More SMEs may go bankrupt, housing investment looks unlikely to recover, and already-cautious consumer sentiment may worsen further as a result of all the talk of tax increases. The prospect of a return to 1990s-style fiscal policy could also harm personal consumption and investment due to Ricardian equivalence. The Specified Commercial Transactions Law and the FIEL, which are nominally designed to protect consumers and investors, actually appear to be dampening consumer spending and investments in financial products.

Spending hurt by lack of rebound in wages, price increases

Real income will likely be squeezed in Jan-Mar 2008 by weak nominal growth in wages/income and a technical increase in inflation from higher oil prices. We estimate that the core CPI will rise 0.6%Y in Jan-Mar, owing to a higher contribution from petroleum-based product prices. The result could be seen as high inflation for market participants inured to prolonged deflation. Also, the inflation that the market is expecting is of the cost-push variety, rather than the demand-pull variety that we had expected to bring an end to deflation. In this case, consumer sentiment is likely to worsen, which would be negative for consumer spending and could be one reason for an even more stagnant tone to the economy in Jan-Mar. Additionally, the reversal of structural reform may slow down productivity growth and worsen cost-push inflation in the longer term.

Risks

We optimistically assume that oil prices will peak out soon, in conjunction with a global slowdown, and at the same time the yen/dollar rate will bottom out. However, we do not think that oil prices or the yen will decline sharply because economic growth in the BRICs is not likely to slow much and oil supplies will probably still be limited. The risk scenario, as we see it, includes a prolonged downturn led by errant policies, further increases in energy prices and sharp yen appreciation.

In this risk scenario, Japan’s economic growth could decline to 0% in 2008. Higher energy prices could seriously hurt SMEs, which are already struggling, through a further deterioration in the terms of trade owing to margin deterioration. The yen appreciation may mitigate the worsening of the terms of trade and benefit the economy, but deflationary effects are likely to take precedence due to faster initial yen appreciation than corporate cost improvements. Also, a slowdown in China’s economy could seriously hurt Japan’s Asia-dependent economy. Our Asian economics team expects China’s economy to continue to grow at a double-digit pace even if the US economy slows sharply, but we see a risk of correction in the Chinese economy as a result of a deterioration in returns on investment due to overinvestment. However, this scenario requires several worst cases to materialize at the same time, and seems for now a low-probability event. If emerging economies slow, oil prices should increasingly adjust and slow the dollar’s slide, since the dollar’s weakness has been the flipside of high oil prices. In this regard, the worst-case scenario is logically inconsistent. We subjectively give it a probability of only 30%.

Possible positive surprises include another bout of euphoria in the asset markets if financial policymakers in major countries succeed in containing the crisis by boldly easing monetary conditions and providing liquidity. Thanks to the strong performance of emerging economies, new risk money in search of the next profit opportunities may continue to gravitate toward markets with high expected returns.



Japan
Buckle Up – Turbulence Ahead (Part II)
December 12, 2007

By Takehiro Sato and Takeshi Yamaguchi | Tokyo, Tokyo

Watch changes in tone in the job market

Employment-related indicators must be carefully followed too. There are signs of change in the trend of improvement to date, with the jobless rate in September-October climbing back above 4% and rising in consecutive months, and indications also that the job offers-to-applications ratio may soon drop below 1 again. Weakness is surfacing for SMEs rather than large enterprises, for women rather than men, and for short-term/daily labor rather than regular employment, showing glimpses of deterioration on the margins for the categories that are most vulnerable to workforce correction pressures. At SMEs in particular, which account for about 70% of employment, profit margin deterioration is capping any increase in labor’s share of capital, and it is already tough for firms to pay higher wages. If wage levels are maintained come what may, pressure to adjust employment could easily spill over. As the BoJ’s Tankan Price DI is showing clearly, for example, the squeeze on profit margins from soaring resource and energy prices is showing up at SMEs rather than large enterprises, so there is no short-term solution. If prevailing conditions persist, stagnant incomes for the 70% of workers employed by SMEs will probably stand in the way of a powerful rebound in consumption.

If supply and demand for labor continue to ease, business investment would also be negatively affected. We have tracked the correlation between the job offers-to-applications ratio and capex ratio for the last 30 years. This shows that as labor supply and demand tightens and the marginal productivity of labor worsens, companies have a rising incentive to make capex. But if labor market conditions ease, companies will have less incentive to make fresh investment in additional capacity and labor saving. In Aichi prefecture, for example, the job offers-to-applicants ratio has now dipped from a level above 2 to the 1.8 range. The auto industry has been building up production in other regions due to the difficulty in obtaining factory sites and labor in Aichi, but with demand for autos expected to decline in Japan and overseas, any loosening of the tight employment markets will dilute the incentives to invest more in plant capacity. Despite this, we are not forecasting a slowdown in domestic capex, as in non-manufacturing industries, especially transportation and electric power, demand for investment in equipment replacement should remain brisk. But with pressure in money markets in the US and Europe sending short-term interest rates up sharply and causing planned capex to be delayed, it is possible that liquidity constraints will take spending plans back to the drawing board in some cases. There would be some impact on capital goods exports from Japan in that event.

Prices to show unexpected upside in the near term, before growth shrinks in 2H08

The core CPI, having been negative since February 2007, perked up to re-enter positive territory in October one month earlier than we had been predicting. Based on our outlook for crude oil prices cited earlier, we think that the CPI could rise more than expected during January-March 2008. The ‘core of core’ CPI, which has been at the heart of our conservative outlook on prices, is also showing bigger rates of increase or narrowing rates of decline for a broadening range of components, and has turned positive overall effectively for the first time since 1999. The upturn in the ‘core of core’ CPI reflects food inflation and some elements that are a bit different from before, and prices appear to be moving into a new phase. As well as food prices, taxi fares are also going up, and the ‘core of core’ index for December could show another increase. The inflationary impact of rising energy prices in year-on-year terms will wear away from April-June 2008, however, so we expect the core CPI growth to shrink heading into the second half of next year. For 2008 on average, we forecast +0.4% (+0.3% for F3/09), and next year may thus come out similar to the recently revised BoJ price outlook (+0.4%).

It is not enough to look only at recent instances of price revisions to decide whether prices are likely to rise sustainably. Many of the recent price revisions represent the first changes in more than a decade, and these one-shot hikes can be virtually ignored, given the CPI weights and industry share. If prices come to be reset more frequently, however, the impact on the CPI could not be ignored. The key to future prices will be the extent to which these types of increases flow through to end-prices in the retail and services sectors and are repeated. If nominal wages turn up, we are confident that this process will be feasible, but the earliest we can expect this even on a macro level would be 2009.

The timing of a positive year-on-year turn for the GDP deflator should be delayed by the increase in oil prices, and is now likely to come in October-December 2008 at the soonest, and to be verifiable in the data around February or March 2009. The domestic demand deflator, meanwhile, is likely to hover around zero.

Downside to corporate profit outlook

Our latest revisions reduce the top-line growth rate in our F3/09 forecast (seasonally adjusted, excluding financials, firms with more than ¥1 billion in capital) to 2.5%Y. With labor’s share of capital at the lowest level since 2004, we expect downside wage rigidity to decelerate corporate earnings (operating surplus) to +3.8% (+5.4% in our last forecast) in F3/08 and to effectively zero growth in F3/09 (+8.0% in our last forecast). Cost increases for raw materials and SG&A expense will also likely act as a drag. For forex, we are forecasting mild yen appreciation, but the benefits of the previous depreciation will continue to take effect with a time lag. There is no call at this point to forecast a large direct negative impact from a stronger yen, and the effect of slowing demand in trading partner nations will be much more influential. Even under these circumstances, if we assume that demand in emerging economies such as those in Asia remains firm, the effects of volume growth should be just enough to prevent corporate profits from declining. In F3/10, with global economies headed by the US recovering, we forecast that both sales and recurring profits will pick up sharply.

Time-limited bills could force an early general election

The fate of time-limited bills affecting the F3/09 budget matters enormously for the economy and the markets, and uncertainty about their passage may depress the market in the near term. Holding an early snap election could be the best way to clear the air, and the ruling parties also need to prepare for this. Specifically, we think that the Diet could be dissolved in January followed by a general election in February, or dissolved in March followed by an election in April. The former timetable would allow F3/09 budget proposals, including time-limited bills, to be formulated and debated under the next administration by the end of the current fiscal year. The latter timetable would be the outcome of horse-trading between the ruling parties (seeking to win approval for time-limited bills by the end of March) and opposition parties (pushing to bring forward the general election). In any event, come the start of next year the political authorities will be on the alert for a break-up of the Diet, and a major theme for asset markets in 2008 will be the political landscape to follow. The economic outlook is not very encouraging, but we think that a reform-minded center-right coalition government could help turn things around.

In the downside scenario, moves to form a center-right government fail, and conservative forces in the ruling and opposition parties coalesce as happened in the mid-1990s. Fiscal reform then goes into retreat, and pork stays in the budget. Key pending reforms for agricultural etc. are shelved, and growth potential is crimped badly as a result. However, if reactionary politics makes a comeback with clouds gathering over growth momentum in economies overseas, the stock market’s disillusionment could deepen, precipitating a mini-crisis.

Even with inflation, a rate cut is a bigger risk than a hike

Monetary policy will likely be gridlocked. Chances of a near-term hike are already remote, and looking ahead to the middle of next year, monetary policy could be turned into a political football with the Diet in a stalemate when the terms of the governor and deputy governors expire on March 19. The possibility of a vacuum in the BoJ’s leadership, which we originally highlighted whimsically, now looks alarmingly real. Even if the vacuum scenario is ruled out, there may not be chances to hike after mid-2008 either, because the pace of price hikes is likely to diminish as time passes. This could thwart moves even after mid-year. As we argued earlier, the peak for the core CPI is likely to arrive in January-March 2008. The issue is the trajectory of core inflation thereafter: the BoJ thinks that core inflation will gradually rise with the passage of time, whereas we expect the reverse. If the BoJ is right, then if a soft inflation-targeting range of 0-2% as the understanding of ‘price stability’ is adopted by the BoJ policy board members, an actual inflation rate of nearly 1% when a majority of members see something below 1% as a guideline for stable prices would point to a need for significant tightening. If we are right, it would be tough to argue for a rate hike, and the strategy of tightening even after mid-2008 could be derailed. And should our earlier risk scenario unfold, a return to the zero interest rate policy unfortunately could not be ruled out.



Asean Economics
Building in Weaker External Demand in 2008
December 12, 2007

By Chetan Ahya | Singapore

US and Europe outlook deterioration

Tighter credit conditions – both in the form of lower availability of funds and higher capital costs – are resulting in a deteriorating macro outlook for the US and euro area economies. Our US economics team is now forecasting a mild recession and has cut its US growth forecasts to 1.1% and 2.7% for 2008 and 2009 from 1.8% and 2.9%, respectively. Similarly, our Europe economics team has recently reduced its Euroland GDP forecast by 0.4pp to 1.6% for 2008 and by 0.3pp to 2.2% for 2009.

How will ASEAN be affected?

Haphazard loan originations and their subsequent spin-off into structured credit products have been at the root of the current economic malaise in the developed world. As a result, products begin to malfunction, funding pressures develop and lending institutions become risk-averse, not knowing what is sitting on the balance sheet of their counterparties. These funding pressures are in turn weighing on the real economy. Although ASEAN is not plagued by the same funding difficulties we are seeing in developed world, it will be impacted as trade growth slows amid weaker external demand. Direct US and EU15 trade makes up about 24% of ASEAN exports. Though intra-Asia trade is holding up relatively well for now, there is likely to be some ripple effects from this part of the world to the developed world’s slowdown as well. From a trade perspective, export-oriented economies such as Singapore and Malaysia would be more impacted than other countries in the region.

In addition, one of the risks we have been highlighting is potential turbulence in financial markets if the growth deceleration in developed economies proves more severe than expected. ASEAN equity markets have been a high-beta play on the S&P 500, outperforming on the way up and underperforming in all previous episodes of risk-reduction. With lower corporate earnings now forecast in the US and Europe, equity markets are likely to be affected, and with them, the availability of risk capital to ASEAN through capital inflows. Previously, loose liquidity conditions, coupled with risk appetite, have led to a build-up of liquidity. This has markedly reduced the cost of capital in economies where credit growth has picked up (particularly Indonesia and the Philippines). In addition, buoyant asset markets have led to strong related business activities for financial hubs such as Singapore. In the reversal, risk-reduction would be most negative for these three economies, in our view. 

Better placed to weather external weakening

ASEAN growth will undoubtedly see a deceleration in 2008 amid the weakening in external conditions and some downside in asset markets. To reflect the downward adjustments in the US and Europe, we are cutting our ASEAN growth forecasts by 0.3pp to 5.3% for 2008 and by 0.1pp to 5.9% for 2009, taking into account the impact on trade balances as well as spillover to domestic demand. For reasons discussed above, Indonesia and Singapore are likely to be most exposed, and we have cut 2008 growth there by 0.4pp and 0.3pp, respectively. However, we still believe that the negative impact from developed economies this time around would be less than proportional (i.e., soft de-coupling), and prospects remain relatively reasonable for the following reasons:

First, ASEAN is heading into the slowdown from a position of relative strength. 3Q07 growth for ASEAN economies has mostly been stronger than expected on domestic demand and we have revised upwards our 2007 forecasts from 6.1% to 6.2% as a result. Arguably, 3Q07 performance is a reflection of past strength, and the brunt of the impact would only be felt in 2008. Still, the starting point for growth matters, and ASEAN now has more room to cushion against the slowdown expected in the US and Europe.

Second, macro fundamentals of the region are very different in the current cycle. Compared to 1997/1998, when the epicenter of the crisis was Asia, and then 2001, when the epicentre of the dot-com bubble was the US but macro fundamentals in Asia were still at the stage of nascent recovery from the aftermath of 1997/98, macro fundamentals in ASEAN have now turned around markedly. Macro balance sheets are now healthy. Specifically, amid the foreign reserves build-up to about 40% of GDP, external debt has now declined to about 31% of GDP. Public debt in relatively higher-indebted countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines (national government debt) has also declined to 33% and 68% of GDP in 2Q07 from previous highs of around 100%. In addition, the region has not had any excesses in terms of the overall leveraging trend post Asian crisis, and the credit-to-deposit ratio has declined to about 70%.

Improvement in the macro balance sheet matters in terms of the reduction in risk premium and vulnerability associated with the external shocks.  A structural improvement in the balance sheet would give policy makers more room to use monetary as well fiscal policy to support growth trend. 

Third, ASEAN domestic demand has typically been correlated with foreign trade as business investments are made with an eye on potential future global demand trend. In the current cycle, both the capex cycle and private consumption trend are already witnessing soft decoupling from the foreign trade cycle amid the construction upswing, the income rise from an acceleration in wage growth and higher commodity prices supporting rural incomes.

To be sure, some of the factors supporting domestic demand strength such as higher commodity prices driving rural incomes could reverse as the global slowdown proves disinflationary. However, the construction capex cycle currently underway such as in Singapore is a result of a decade-long construction recession where residential and commercial space excesses has been worked off. In addition, infrastructure construction is on the rise. While further global softening could present downside surprises on real estate demand, current low vacancy rates amid a demand and supply mismatch should put a floor to construction activities and lend a degree of resilience to domestic demand momentum. Lastly, with ASEAN 5 budget balances having improved from -3.2% in 2001 to -1.2% in 2006, governments have the fiscal wherewithal to lift expenditure, and election spending amid the election season in ASEAN should help bolster domestic demand strength in the short term, in our view. 

What’s the pecking order within ASEAN?

Within our coverage, we are positive on Thailand and Malaysia in the short term and positive on Indonesia and Singapore in the medium-to-long term. The Philippines remains in the middle of the pack. As mentioned, Indonesia and Singapore are likely to be more affected by the global slowdown due to availability of risk capital and trade linkages, respectively. However, over the medium term we are constructive on Indonesia due to its healthy demographic trends, relatively stable democratic politics and its ongoing reform efforts, which are slowly building towards a critical mass. Indeed, we believe that government reforms have already resulted in an inflexion point in infrastructure investment trends. Despite the high-beta nature of the economy, we are also constructive on Singapore, principally due to the government diversifying the economy and its immigration policy.  

However, in the shorter term of the next 3-6 months, we are relatively more positive on Thailand and Malaysia. In Thailand, though recent polls showing the popularity of the People Power Party (splinter group of Thai Rak Thai) have raised the risk of military intervention again, our base case estimate still builds in an improvement in the political environment post the December 23 election. We expect the country to move forward with formation of a coalition government, albeit a weak one. This should support a continued soft recovery in domestic demand amid negative external conditions. For Malaysia, there could be short-term support from relatively strong domestic demand, with increased government spending prior to early elections in 1H08.